Search result: Catalogue data in Spring Semester 2021
Architecture Master | ||||||
Master Studies (Programme Regulations 2017) | ||||||
Focus Work Realization in the respective fields of the institutes. Definition of topics by professors, in consultation with the students. The content may also refer to an elective course. The performance assessment comprises either a purely written examination followed by an oral examination or a creative, manual or drawing work, including a description, followed by an oral examination. At least one focus work is a written work followed by an oral exam. The written work fulfills the criteria of a scientific paper in a formal sense. In addition to the design, crafting or drawing part, it also includes a written description of the question, methodology and knowledge gained. A creative, crafting or graphic focus work is shown in a public exhibition, a purely written focus work is accessible to the public. | ||||||
Field of Historic Building Research and Conservation Definition of topics by professors, in consultation with the students (student's proposal / content of an elective course). Performance assessment: Purely written examination followed by an oral examination OR a creative, manual or drawing work, including a description, followed by an oral examination. At least one focus work is a written work followed by an oral exam. The written work fulfills the criteria of a scientific paper in a formal sense. In addition to the design, crafting or drawing part, it also includes a written description of the question, methodology and possibly gained knowledge. A creative, crafting or graphic focus work is shown in a public exhibition, a purely written focus work is accessible to the public. Information on exams and grades: Art. 29 of the MSc D-ARCH regulations. | ||||||
Number | Title | Type | ECTS | Hours | Lecturers | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
063-0952-21L | Focus Work FS21 in the Field of Historic Building Research and Conservation (IDB) | W | 6 credits | 13A | Supervisors | |
Abstract | Analysis of a single monument or a small group of interrelated monuments with the methods of archeological building research. Embedding of the objects studied into a context of construction history by means of archival and literature studies. | |||||
Objective | In-depth knowledge of the methods of archeological building research and construction history. Case-oriented in-depth knowledge of a selected historic building or construction type in its technical, social and economic setting and its architectural relevance. | |||||
Content | This study will require the in-depth analysis of a historic structure or a small group of structures. This includes an object documentation (survey drawings, photographic record, textual description). Contextual information to be researched by the methods of construction history (archival, literature). | |||||
063-0356-21L | Building Research and Constrcution History (Thesis Elective) | W | 6 credits | 13A | S. Holzer | |
Abstract | Within three elective courses the students need to fulfill an elective work (seminar work). Elective works serve the independent way of dealing with the contents of the according elective course. | |||||
Objective | Aim of this seminar work is to learn how to write a small thesis on a case study. This work should include a creative text, but also to obey certain rules, which turn a regular text into a scientific one. | |||||
Content | Please contact us well before to select a topic. You may suggest topics by yourself, or accept topics provided by us. General conditions include: - The seminar work is largely based on the in-situ analysis of a historical structure - The object must be accessible to the tutor (no objects outside Switzerland may be selected, with exceptions for objects in close vicinity of the border) - the object must reach a minimum level of historic interest (no studies of "grandma's house", no prepraratory work for you architectural office) - research in situ must be complemented by archival research and literature studies, and a written report has to be submitted alongside with the plans (no purely graphical submissions) Further information: Link | |||||
Field of Design and Architecture Definition of topics by professors, in consultation with the students (student's proposal / content of an elective course). Performance assessment: Purely written examination followed by an oral examination OR a creative, manual or drawing work, including a description, followed by an oral examination. At least one focus work is a written work followed by an oral exam. The written work fulfills the criteria of a scientific paper in a formal sense. In addition to the design, crafting or drawing part, it also includes a written description of the question, methodology and possibly gained knowledge. A creative, crafting or graphic focus work is shown in a public exhibition, a purely written focus work is accessible to the public. Information on exams and grades: Art. 29 of the MSc D-ARCH regulations. | ||||||
Number | Title | Type | ECTS | Hours | Lecturers | |
063-0552-21L | Focus Work FS21 in the Field of Design and Architecture (IEA) For supervision in the field of "Model and Design" choose the Study Director. | W | 6 credits | 13A | Supervisors | |
Abstract | Indentation work of the Institute IEA of which the content can also refer to an elective subject. The topic is determined in consultation with the chosen professor. | |||||
Objective | The result is either a purely written work followed by an oral examination or a creative, craft or drawing work - including description - followed by oral examination. In at least one specialization work, the performance assessment is a written work followed by an oral examination. In formal terms, the written work has to fulfill all the criteria of a scientific work. In addition to the design, crafting or drawing part, a design work also includes a written description of the question, methodology and possible gain in knowledge of the work . The written or creative craft or drawing work and the oral exam are each evaluated individually. These two evaluations are offset against each other and give the overall grade for the specialization work" | |||||
Content | In-depth work is carried out in the respective subject areas of the institute. The professors determine the topics in consultation with the students. The content of the in-depth work can also relate to the content of an elective course. The performance assessment comprises either a purely written work with a subsequent oral examination or a creative, technical or graphic work, including a description, with a subsequent oral examination. At least in the case of one in-depth thesis, the performance assessment must take the form of a purely written work with a subsequent oral examination (Regulations Paragraph 2 Letter a). In formal terms, the written work must meet the criteria of an academic paper. In addition to the creative, manual or drawing part, it includes a written description of the question, the methodology and the possible gain in knowledge of the work. The students take the oral examination with the professor with whom they have discussed the topic of the in-depth thesis. The written or creative, manual or drawing work and the oral examination are each assessed individually. These two assessments are offset against each other and result in the overall grade for the in-depth work. Paragraph 7 remains reserved. The oral examination can only be taken if the written work or the creative, technical or graphic work is sufficient. A thesis is passed if the overall grade is at least 4. It is considered not passed if the overall grade is below 4; if the written or creative, technical or graphic work is unsatisfactory and therefore the oral examination cannot be taken; in such a case, the failure will be noted with the term “dropout”. An in-depth thesis that has not been passed cannot be repeated. In order to acquire the required CP, a further in-depth work must be carried out and the performance must be assessed with an overall grade of at least 4. The number of attempts is limited (see regulations). If more than one “in-depth study” course unit is not passed, the course is considered to have been definitively failed, which leads to exclusion from the course. The creative, craft or drawing in-depth work is publicly exhibited. Purely written in-depth theses are made publicly available. | |||||
Prerequisites / Notice | The indentation work can be carried out to a predefined or self-selected theme of the architecture. If several works are carried out, they must be selected from the departments of at least two different institutes of the D-ARCH. The details are regulated in Art. 34. | |||||
063-0174-21L | Spatial Concepts in Film and Architecture (Thesis Elective) | W | 6 credits | 13A | M. Bächtiger Zwicky, A. Gigon | |
Abstract | Within three elective courses the students need to fulfill an elective work (seminar work). Elective works serve the independent way of dealing with the contents of the according elective course. | |||||
Objective | The aim of these papers is to foster an independent engagement with the subjects of the seminar. A scientific familiarization with the respective themes is required. | |||||
063-0188-21L | Procedures in Design - Techniques of Construction (Thesis Elective) | W | 6 credits | 13A | M. Peter | |
Abstract | Within three elective courses the students need to fulfill an elective work (seminar work). Elective works serve the independent way of dealing with the contents of the according elective course. | |||||
Objective | We aim at analyzing the interrelation between structural techniques and formal appearance as well as expression. The thematically different parts of structural design, building shell and material science are linked with architectural design in practice and put into the broader context of architectural theory. | |||||
063-0194-21L | Performance and Intervention (Thesis Elective) | W | 6 credits | 13A | K. Sander, M. Wermke | |
Abstract | Individual completion of an artistic project and public presentation (elective coursework). | |||||
Objective | Creative Experience: Definition of ones own interests and realization of an artistic project. Development of an advanced concept of performance and intervention. | |||||
Content | Individual completion of an artistic project and public presentation (elective coursework). | |||||
Prerequisites / Notice | Mentoring discussion upon agreement. | |||||
063-0198-21L | Photography (Thesis Elective) | W | 6 credits | 13A | K. Sander, E. Vonplon | |
Abstract | Individual completion of an artistic project with photography and public presentation (elective coursework). | |||||
Objective | Creative Experience: Definition of ones own interests and realization of an artistic project based on photography. Development of an advanced concept of photography. | |||||
Prerequisites / Notice | Application for the elective thesis by email to the lecturer. | |||||
063-0202-21L | 3D Scanning and Freeform Modeling (Thesis Elective) | W | 6 credits | 13A | K. Sander | |
Abstract | Individual completion of an artistic project with 3-d photography (scanning) and digital modeling (elective coursework). | |||||
Objective | Creative Experience: Definition of ones own interests and realization of an artistic project using 3d photography and digital modeling. Experimental research for expanded usage of this tools. | |||||
Prerequisites / Notice | Enrolment for the elective course: Email to Link. | |||||
063-0220-21L | Artistic Thinking and Acting (Thesis Elective) | W | 6 credits | 13A | T. Becker | |
Abstract | Individual completion of an artistic project and public presentation (elective coursework). | |||||
Objective | Creative Experience: Definition of ones own interests, development, and realization of an artistic project. | |||||
Prerequisites / Notice | Mentoring discussion with Tobias Becker: Link | |||||
063-0224-21L | Perspective Drawing / Free Drawing (Thesis Elective) Enrolment only possible after consultation with the lecturer. | W | 6 credits | 13A | K. Sander, H. E. Franzen, M. Léonard-Contant | |
Abstract | A topic, a graphic assignment or problem, selected by the student is furthered through independent work and its evolution documented. | |||||
Objective | An elective project in drawing is an assignment with the characteristics of research. The incorporation of manual/technical processes and artistic reflection serves to develop personal, artistic criteria. | |||||
063-0230-21L | 360° - Reality to Virtuality (Thesis Elective) | W | 6 credits | 13A | K. Sander | |
Abstract | Within three elective courses the students need to fulfill an elective work (seminar work). Elective works serve the independent way of dealing with the contents of the according elective course. | |||||
Objective | The aim of these papers is to foster an independent engagement with the subjects of the seminar. A scientific familiarization with the respective themes is required. The extent of such a paper ranges from 20 to 30 pages. | |||||
Content | The aim of these papers is to foster an independent engagement with the subjects of the seminar. A scientific familiarization with the respective themes is required. The extent of such a paper ranges from 20 to 30 pages. | |||||
063-0436-21L | Model and Design (Thesis Elective) Enrollment is only possible after completing the elective of the same name! Development of your own topic proposal in the areas of model making, material, design and construction. Independent work. | W | 6 credits | 13A | A. Tellini, K. Derleth | |
Abstract | The elective works serve an in depth case study. The advanced study offer students the opportunity to deal with a specific aspect of design over a longer period of time. The work consists of a practical and a theoretical part - reflection/documentation of the developed facts. | |||||
Objective | Independent, in depth study ot the contents according to the elective course and examination of aspects of architectural model building. | |||||
Content | Content and output of the study to be agreed with the lecturer of the elective course. | |||||
Prerequisites / Notice | Elective thesis can be taken at the Raplab after completion of the elective course. A specific topic proposal within the fields of model making, material, design and construction should be presented. Group work in a team of two students is possible (increasing scope and effort). Independent work is required. | |||||
063-0764-21L | New Focal Points of Construction (Thesis Elective) | W | 6 credits | 13A | D. Mettler, D. Studer | |
Abstract | Within three elective courses the students need to fulfill an elective work (seminar work). Elective works serve the independent way of dealing with the contents of the according elective course. | |||||
Objective | Within three elective courses the students need to fulfill an elective work (seminar work). Elective works serve the independent way of dealing with the contents of the according elective course. | |||||
063-0820-21L | Planning Strategies for Complex Buildings Using the Example of Health Facilities (Thesis Elective) | W | 6 credits | 13A | T. Guthknecht | |
Abstract | Independently written scientific paper concerning a subject in the area of health facility planning and design with special focus upon the dynamic changes in health care services and the according planning and building reactions to them. | |||||
Objective | The objective is that the students engage in a debate of a differentiated functional planning as a basis for health care buildings which are to be successful medically, operationally and in design. On the basis of a given scope of themes the students carry out research aiming for possible improvements in health facility planning. The scope of subjects is announced at the beginning of each semester. | |||||
Content | Health care buildings are subject to constant change. In a new hospital building 60% of the diagnostic and treatment areas are subject to building changes within the first 10 years of operation. Architecture has to develop concepts which accommodate this level of dynamics into the building structure in a better way. In the coming years this need for adaptability is going to be challenges even further by the even more reducing health care resources. The paper should discuss in this context a specific question in detail by analysing problems and developing and discussing potential planning solutions. | |||||
063-0824-21L | Material-Lab (Thesis Elective) | W | 6 credits | 13A | A. Spiro | |
Abstract | It is the elective's object to become aquainted with a material and its processing in a exploring and experimental manner. It aims to raise the awareness of the relation of material, construction, form and architectural expression. | |||||
Objective | Students should achieve the skill to gain theoretic and applied know-how in the field of construction autonomouly. Working manually with the material the students experience the transfer of the planned project into realisation. | |||||
Content | Content and output of the study to be agreed with the lecturer of the elective course. | |||||
Field of History and Theory of Architecture Definition of topics by professors, in consultation with the students (student's proposal / content of an elective course). Performance assessment: Purely written examination followed by an oral examination OR a creative, manual or drawing work, including a description, followed by an oral examination. At least one focus work is a written work followed by an oral exam. The written work fulfills the criteria of a scientific paper in a formal sense. In addition to the design, crafting or drawing part, it also includes a written description of the question, methodology and possibly gained knowledge. A creative, crafting or graphic focus work is shown in a public exhibition, a purely written focus work is accessible to the public. Information on exams and grades: Art. 29 of the MSc D-ARCH regulations. | ||||||
Number | Title | Type | ECTS | Hours | Lecturers | |
063-0852-21L | Focus Work FS21 in the Field of History and Theory in Architecture (gta) | W | 6 credits | 13A | Supervisors | |
Abstract | Indentation work of the Institute gta, of which the content can also refer to an elective subject. The topic is determined in consultation with the chosen professor. | |||||
Objective | The result is either a purely written work followed by an oral examination or a creative, craft or drawing work - including description - followed by oral examination. In at least one specialization work, the performance assessment is a written work followed by an oral examination. In formal terms, the written work has to fulfill all the criteria of a scientific work. In addition to the design, crafting or drawing part, a design work also includes a written description of the question, methodology and possible gain in knowledge of the work . The written or creative craft or drawing work and the oral exam are each evaluated individually. These two evaluations are offset against each other and give the overall grade for the specialization work" | |||||
Content | In-depth work is carried out in the respective subject areas of the institute. The professors determine the topics in consultation with the students. The content of the in-depth work can also relate to the content of an elective course. The performance assessment comprises either a purely written work with a subsequent oral examination or a creative, technical or graphic work, including a description, with a subsequent oral examination. At least in the case of one in-depth thesis, the performance assessment must take the form of a purely written work with a subsequent oral examination (Regulations Paragraph 2 Letter a). In formal terms, the written work must meet the criteria of an academic paper. In addition to the creative, manual or drawing part, it includes a written description of the question, the methodology and the possible gain in knowledge of the work. The students take the oral examination with the professor with whom they have discussed the topic of the in-depth thesis. The written or creative, manual or drawing work and the oral examination are each assessed individually. These two assessments are offset against each other and result in the overall grade for the in-depth work. Paragraph 7 remains reserved. The oral examination can only be taken if the written work or the creative, technical or graphic work is sufficient. A thesis is passed if the overall grade is at least 4. It is considered not passed if the overall grade is below 4; if the written or creative, technical or graphic work is unsatisfactory and therefore the oral examination cannot be taken; in such a case, the failure will be noted with the term “dropout”. An in-depth thesis that has not been passed cannot be repeated. In order to acquire the required CP, a further in-depth work must be carried out and the performance must be assessed with an overall grade of at least 4. The number of attempts is limited (see regulations). If more than one “in-depth study” course unit is not passed, the course is considered to have been definitively failed, which leads to exclusion from the course. The creative, craft or drawing in-depth work is publicly exhibited. Purely written in-depth theses are made publicly available. | |||||
Prerequisites / Notice | The indentation work can be carried out to a predefined or self-selected theme of the architecture. If several works are carried out, they must be selected from the departments of at least two different institutes of the D-ARCH. The details are regulated in Art. 34. | |||||
063-0120-21L | Theory of Architecture IV (Thesis Elective) | W | 6 credits | 13A | M. Gnehm | |
Abstract | An elective thesis in architectural theory is a written student assignment of an architectural issue or question, which is to be elaborated into a scientific paper in consultation with the advisor. | |||||
Objective | Within the framework of an elective thesis the student enhances the acquired knowledge in architectural theory in written form. The thesis elective serves the acquirement of methodologies, the derivation, development and verbalization of conclusions and the contextualization within a theoretical setting. | |||||
Content | The contents of the elective thesis are expected to link to the subject matter of the attended course. | |||||
063-0170-21L | Seminar Architectural Criticism (Thesis Elective) | W | 6 credits | 13A | L. Stalder | |
Abstract | In the framework of three elective courses, students need prepare elective works (seminar works). | |||||
Objective | The aim of these papers is to foster an independent engagement with the subjects of the seminar. A scientific familiarization with the respective themes is required. The extent of such a paper ranges from 20 to 30 pages. | |||||
Prerequisites / Notice | Interested students are kindly asked to contact us in order to discuss possible projects. | |||||
063-0172-21L | History, Criticism and Theory of Architecture (Thesis Elective) | W | 6 credits | 13A | L. Stalder | |
Abstract | Within three elective courses the students need to fulfill an elective work (seminar work). Elective works serve the independent way of dealing with the contents of the according elective course. | |||||
Objective | The goal is to develop a framework of questions within the field of the history and theory of architecture as well as cultural history and to discuss it in a text that will form a scientific thesis. Personal viewpoints and arguments should be based on historical and theoretical sources and literature, and should be presented with reference to the source. | |||||
063-0318-21L | History of Art and Architecture (Thesis Elective) | W | 6 credits | 13A | M. Delbeke | |
Abstract | Essay on a subject from the field of architectural history | |||||
Objective | Independent preparation of a scholarly essay on a topic from the field of architectural history. | |||||
Content | The aim of the elective course paper is to discuss a topic freely selected from the field of architectural history, in agreement with the assistant lecturer(s). In addition to original ideas, positions taken in the history of research on the subject should also be discussed. It is important to use the correct scholarly format and clear language. The paper should be approximately 36,000 characters in length and should also include as much pictorial material as needed. At the beginning and in the end the paper will be discussed in detail. |
- Page 1 of 2 All