# 401-3833-65L Chaotically Singular Spacetimes

Semester | Autumn Semester 2017 |

Lecturers | H. Knörrer |

Periodicity | non-recurring course |

Course | Does not take place this semester. |

Language of instruction | English |

Abstract | One might have, more provacatively, entitled the course: How does time end (in, Einstein's general relativity)? In a word, badly. Not in a whimper, nor in a crunch, but in something much more exotic. |

Learning objective | |

Content | One might have, more provacatively, entitled the course: How does time end (in, Einstein's general relativity)? In a word, badly. Not in a whimper, nor in a crunch, but in something much more exotic. More, technically, what does a generic singular point, restricting time, in solutions to the Einstein gravitational field equations look like? Special cosmological solutions, such as Freedman's, do have singularities. In 1963, Lifshitz and Khalatnikov 'constructed a class' of singular solutions and concluded that '... the presence of a singularity in time is NOT a necessary property of cosmological models of the general theory of relativity, and that the general case of an arbitrary distribution of matter and gravitational field does not lead to the appearance of a singularity.' In 1965 Penrose and Hawking formulated and proved 'incompleteness' theorems that convinced even Lifshitz and Khalatnikov that singularities in time ARE a necessary property of cosmological models of the general theory of relativity. Penrose and Hawking proved, that under very general, physically reasonable conditions, a spacetime (that is, a solution to the Einstein equations) has a light ray (null geodesic) that suddenly ends ('incompleteness') sufficiently far in the past. They adroitly sidestep the problem of defining what a singularity acturally is, by saying it is the 'place' where their light rays end. The proofs of incompleteness theorems are not hard. That's good. Unfortunately, they are by their very nature completely non constructive and provide no quantitative information at all about what a 'singularity' really looks like. In 1970, Belinskii, Khalatnikov and Lifshitz revisited the work of 1963 and found that Khalatnikov and Lifshitz had missed something and that '... we shall show that there exists a general solution which exhibits a physical singularity with respect to time.' In 1982 they revised the 1970 proposal. Their work culminates in a series of fascinating, but very, very heuristic, statements about the possible existence of a class of singular solutions to the field equations. These heuristic statements are referred to as the 'BKL Conjectures'. Next semester, we will rigorously formulate and prove the 'BKL Conjectures' for homogeneous spacetimes. That is, we will construct a set of initial data with positive measure which evolve into homogeneous, chaotically singular spacetimes that exhibit all of the BKL phenomenology. Most importantly, there are chaotic oscillations, growing in magnitude, whose distribution is governed by the continued fraction expansion of a parameter appearing in the initial data. The lectures will be completely self contained. One doesn't need to know anything about general relativity; the Einstein field equations will be introduced from scratch. We will classify real, three dimensional Lie algebras, introduce tensor analysis and discuss the geometry of homogeneneous spacetimes. We will also derive the basic properties of continued fractions and the Gauss map $\displaystyle x \mapsto \frac 1x - \Bigl\lfloor \frac 1x \Bigr\rfloor$ from $(0,1) \smallsetminus \mathbb Q$ to itself. |

Lecture notes | There will be lecture notes. |

Prerequisites / Notice | First year analysis and linear algebra are the only prerequisites. |