Milica Topalovic: Katalogdaten im Frühjahrssemester 2023 |
| Name | Frau Prof. Milica Topalovic |
| Namensvarianten | Milica Topalovic Milica Topalović |
| Lehrgebiet | Architektur und Territorialplanung |
| Adresse | Professur Arch.&Territorialplanung ETH Zürich, ONA G 41 Neunbrunnenstr. 50 8093 Zürich SWITZERLAND |
| Telefon | +41 44 633 85 03 |
| mt@arch.ethz.ch | |
| URL | https://topalovic.arch.ethz.ch |
| Departement | Architektur |
| Beziehung | Ausserordentliche Professorin |
| Nummer | Titel | ECTS | Umfang | Dozierende | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 052-0712-23L | Sessions on Territory - Urbanism in a Broken World: REPAIR  | 1 KP | 1V | M. Topalovic | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Kurzbeschreibung | SESSIONS ON TERRITORY is a series of public debates on the political economy of architecture and territory. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lernziel | It is high time for new visions of society – also and especially in architecture. We are witnessing a paradigm shift across design and art disciplines. Reparative politics and practices are on the agenda attempting to heal “the broken world”. The material and social crisis of capitalism are countered by alternative narratives of repair which include the values and practices of care, maintenance, plurality, reappropriation and reparation. Can repair and reparative thinking be positioned as a paradigmatic orientation in our field, alternative to growth-based and techno-fix approaches? How is ethos of repair being turned into praxis? Can we repair and decolonise the curriculum and the construction industry? Can we reform the office, and cultivate material cultures based on care and reciprocity with people and nature? Highlighting emerging politics and practices of repair that aim to reduce exploitation, care for what already exists, repair what has been damaged, and conserve resources, the upcoming series will untangle how such alternatives in design education and practice have the potential to counter the condition of manifold crises. The sessions on repair are embedded within THE GREAT REPAIR, an exhibition and publication project realized in collaboration between ARCH+ gGmbH, the Akademie der Künste, Berlin, the University of Luxembourg’s Department of Geography and Spatial Planning, and the Department of Architecture at ETH Zürich during 2022-23. The recently published ARCH+ 250 The Great Repair—Politiken der Reparaturgesellscahft serves as the departure point for the program. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Inhalt | The six sessions on repair take place on selected Mondays during the spring term. Every intervention by a guest speaker is followed by a discussion with invited respondents. 27.02.2023 THE GREAT REPAIR: LAUNCH ARCH+ #250 EDITORS in conversation with Marc Angélil, Silke Langenberg, Momoyo Kaijima, and Bas Princen 13.03.2023 Repair of Architectural Pedagogies ANA MILJAČKI in conversation with Freek Persyn, Grégoire Farquet, and Unmasking Space 03.04.2023 Repair of The Office SECTION OF ARCHITECTURAL WORKERS (UVW-SAW) in conversation with guests 24.04.2023 Repair of Objects SILKE LANGEBERG, SARA ZELLER & YVES EBNÖTHER a conversation 15.05.2023 Rights of Nature MARJETICA POTRČ in conversation with guests 22.05.2023 Self-Repair for a Broken Discipline CHARLOTTE MALTERRE-BARTHES in conversation with guests | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Skript | The live sessions will also be broadcast here: https://ethz.zoom.us/j/66752510171 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Literatur | The recently published ARCH+ 250. THE GREAT REPAIR–Politiken der Reparaturgesellschaft is the main reference for the sessions and it is available here: https://archplus.net/de/archiv/ausgabe/250/ Texts to accompany each session will be sent via email prior to the event. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Kompetenzen |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 052-1148-23L | Architectural Design V-IX: Agrarian Project - Commoning Land and Labour around Zurich (M.Topalovic)  Please register (www.mystudies.ethz.ch) only after the internal enrolment for the design classes (see http://www.einschreibung.arch.ethz.ch/design.php). Project grading at semester end is based on the list of enrolments on 31.3.23, 24:00 h. This is the ultimate deadline to unsubscribe or enroll for the studio! | 14 KP | 16U | M. Topalovic | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Kurzbeschreibung | The studio wants to interrogate this hidden and pervasive partitioning of the Swiss territory resulting in the divide between the so-called rural and the urban: Can we weave the seemingly disconnected worlds of agriculture and urban living together? Can we imagine cooperatives and commons on farms and in villages that promise optimistic and attractive ways of living and working in the countryside? | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lernziel | The semester consists of investigative journeys and intensive studio sessions. Architecture of Territory values intellectual curiosity, commitment and team spirit. We are looking for avid travellers, motivated to make strong and independent contributions. Students will learn to apply a range of methods and sources pertaining to territory, including ethnographic fieldwork, literature research and essay writing, drawing techniques, videography, and online publishing. Students work in groups of two to four. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Inhalt | The first track of our investigation concerns land labour: Who will work the land around Zurich in the future? Farmer’s numbers have dwindled steadily since decades: Today they make up just 1.1 % of the population of the Canton. Most of them run family businesses faced with long working hours, low incomes, absence of social benefits and social recognition, and pushed into a risky reliance on direct payments, automation, chemical fixes and the use of seasonal labour. Research has shown that in contrast to such model of intensive monoculture production, a pathway of diversity of a landscape, whether biological or cultural, and of better quality of food, requires more human work, and more care. Post-growth economists are convinced that “if agriculture is to be practiced according to ecological and social principles ... more people will have to work in agriculture again.” (Seidl et al.) How can we make such change possible? The second track of our investigation concerns the questions of land property. The crisis of agriculture linked to the capitalist land-use regulation currently favours commodification of land, intensification of production and an ever-increasing size of farms over time. One of the strictest land laws in Europe, the Swiss Bundesgesetz über das bäuerliche Bodenrecht, regulates the agricultural land market by maintaining fixed land prices at low levels to promote farmer land ownership. Owning or buying land in Switzerland is only possible for professional farmers within 10 km radius from their place of residence, making it hard or impossible for landless or aspiring farmers to acquire land and enter agricultural practice. In contrast to this condition, historic and contemporary practices of commoning offer a different picture. Private ownership of farmland in Switzerland is a relatively recent phenomenon. The common lands, Allmende, have for centuries constituted a prevalent form governing common pool resources including land, forest and water. Many recent initiatives explore similar land-sharing models and other types of resource pooling. In the studio, we will follow such examples in order to create novel and attractive spaces of living and working in the countryside based on the governance of common pool resources. At the start of the semester we will study precedents of agrarian communities and spaces—from kibbutzim in Israel, Das grüne Manifest by Leberecht Migge, to contemporary practices of community-supported agriculture in Switzerland. In a second step, through intensive fieldwork during the seminar week in six select communities in the vicinity of the city of Zurich, we will engage with farmers, workers and experts. Ultimately, we will synthesise our findings to create an agrarian project exploring an optimistic future for the countryside of Zurich based on the ideas of social solidarity and the common good. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Voraussetzungen / Besonderes | Group work only Introduction: 21 February, 9 am, ONA G35 Final crits: 31.5.2023 CHF 50.-- per student (estimated costs, without possible seminar week costs) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Kompetenzen |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 061-0144-23L | AGROECOLOGICAL REPAIR. Transformative Practices for the Zurich Territory. | 12 KP | 16U | M. Topalovic | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Kurzbeschreibung | Design studio in collaboration with the MAS in Urban and Territorial Design, probing the possibility of an agro-ecological transformation across the territory of Zurich based on ecological repair and social justice. Contributing to an urgent transdisciplinary political debate on the landscapes of food cultivation and their relationships to cities. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lernziel | The critical role of agriculture within the territorial project has hardly been examined within the urban debate. However, as once rural landscapes are engulfed and surrounded by extended urban systems, and as higher biodiversity rates are recorded in cities than in the countryside, the metabolical links across these ecosystems and the need for a paradigm shift in design thinking within both local and regional contexts, become not only clear but also urgent. In the face of unpredictable climatic changes, fluctuating water reserves and pressure on agricultural land to produce not only food, but also biofuel, solar energy, leisure landscapes and further demands of expanding urbanisation, agricultural practices across the majority of the Global North still predominantly consist of pouring chemicals into the soil, polluting aquifers, exploiting imported seasonal labour and relying on industrially-produced seed, feed and food deliveries. Switzerland is no exception. While the Swiss countryside appears to be well cared-for, carefully manicured, preserving valued traditional spaces and activities, producing high quality and culturally valued products, research has shown that the unseen degradation of soil, water and air quality, as well as the more palpable domination of monocultural pastures geared towards industrialised production methods and the lack of biodiversity, add up to an urgent condition of depletion and exploitation. Commodification of nature and life has become one of the key instruments of agricultural intensification. Birds and insects have disappeared from the Swiss countryside, while production from the iconic Swiss cow has swollen to five times since the 1950s, not because of increased livestock numbers, but through selective breeding. Milking cow numbers have actually decreased by one third since 2000, while production has remained steady at 3.4 million tonnes/year. Even so-called conventional farmers engaged in intensive forms of production are under extreme economic pressure, having to rely significantly on subsidies, chemical imports and seasonal labour. Through direct payments for biodiversity and cultural landscape protection, they have become veritable “caretakers” of the Swiss landscape. Despite growing awareness around sustainable food production, pioneering agricultural practices from regenerative farming to demeter, community supported agriculture and other approaches, occupy only a small percentage of the economy. This is a profession difficult to enter under current Swiss regulations, including farmer’s education and inheritance laws. Today in Switzerland two farms per day cease production due economic difficulties. We did not inherit the land from our parents, we borrowed from our children”, (Farmer Zimmerberg). The Zurich cantonal border corresponds roughly to the commuting space of the metropolitan region, hence the agricultural landscapes are tightly interwoven with expanding urban development. Instead of focusing on the well-studied cities, our studio applies design as an instrument to readdress the territorial subject as a whole and develop an integrated vision for its agroecological transformation. This reversed view lies at the core of the methodology. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Inhalt | The MAS explores a new role for the designer who repairs damages wrought by urbanisation processes in the previous decades and asks how we can catalyse positive processes of transformation that lead to socially and environmentally just landscapes and territories. The project draws on a wealth of precedents at the Architecture of Territory Chair, and the accompanying lectures, sessions and courses. However an overarching territorial concept for the canton of Zurich, based on agroecological regeneration has never been drawn, visualised or proposed. Together, the eight case studies explored during the semester will contribute to such a vision. Our hypothesis is that agricultural land and practices can be interpreted through a number of distinct socio-spatial landscape typologies incorporating both the built and the unbuilt space. These typologies are historically and geographically specific–for example drained valley floors or pre-alpine pastures–therefore design efforts of agroecological repair must be situated, and respond to these unique contexts. This semester eight such typologies at dedicated sites have been selected for further design investigation; Metropolitan Core (Zurich City), Gold Coast (Wädenswil), Drained Valley Floors (Furttal), Crop Rotation Plains (Embrach), Mosaic mid-heights (Mettenstetten), Seasonal Pastures (Wetzikon), Vital Streams & Water-bodies (The Glatt), Forests & Canopies (Tösstal). By diving deep into these specific landscapes of agricultural production, the studio aspires to raise questions unlocking the transformative potential of reparative thinking and practices in urban and territorial design. Can we rethink social relations linked to the land and define space for solidarity practices in agriculture? Can we redesign the cultural laws leading to commodification of landscape? Can we undo previous industrial practices and models of land drainage and other complex processes? The principles of agroecology are as old as agriculture itself, having long been utilised by, for example the indigenous Nahua or Māori people. Today supported by the UN Food and Agriculture Organisation, in particular towards achieving 12 of the 17 UN Sustainable Development Goals, agroecology is summarised in 10 principles that also include social values and governance. The design studio is at the core of the programme–sessions, courses and inputs are curated in such a way as to directly support the design work and project development through interdisciplinary exchange. In addition, significant resources are reserved for field work investigation in this unique studio, which plays a central role within the methodology–design work is based on in-depth exploration of the field and context. We will learn from different practices and engage with both regular and more extreme farmers and pioneers. Mobile and multisited ethnographies, interviews, oral histories, participant observation, visual study and archival work are indispensable to building a body of original research and to gradually formulating the research and design hypotheses in the studio. The fieldwork is generally conducted after the semester’s three-week overture period. It encompasses group and individual visits to project sites, meetings with inhabitants, community organizations and municipal offices. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Skript | REPRESENTING LANDSCAPE AND POSITIONS The project work develops in the form of a web-based investigative reportage. In the field, participants work through interviews, sketches, video and field notes. Back in the studio, experts in GIS, web design, architectural writing and videography support the process. Cartography is fundamental for both analytical and projective approaches to territory: GIS-based geospatial modelling will be applied on the project site to construct novel interpretative and critical landscape representations. Film and photography capture polysemic dimensions of territory, its social, material and more-than-human manifestations. An introduction to visual ethnography and visual anthropology will form an important element of the course. The investigative reportages and visions will be presented online and in the public forum meant to inform design practice and public discourse. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Literatur | A literature list will be made availabkle at the beginning of semester. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Kompetenzen |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 078-0102-00L | Core Design and Research Studio II | 17 KP | 18G | M. Topalovic | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Kurzbeschreibung | The Agroecology Repair design studio addresses the multiple challenges of decoupling agriculture from the capitalist dogma of accumulation and probes the possibility of an agro-ecological transformation across the territory of Zurich based on ecological repair and social justice. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lernziel | The critical role of agriculture within the territorial project has hardly been examined within the urban debate. However, as once rural landscapes are engulfed and surrounded by extended urban systems, and as higher biodiversity rates are recorded in cities than in the countryside, the metabolical links across these ecosystems and the need for a paradigm shift in design thinking within both local and regional contexts, become not only clear but also urgent. In the face of unpredictable climatic changes, fluctuating water reserves and pressure on agricultural land to produce not only food, but also biofuel, solar energy, leisure landscapes and further demands of expanding urbanisation, agricultural practices across the majority of the Global North still predominantly consist of pouring chemicals into the soil, polluting aquifers, exploiting imported seasonal labour and relying on industrially-produced seed, feed and food deliveries. Switzerland is no exception. While the Swiss countryside appears to be well cared-for, carefully manicured, preserving valued traditional spaces and activities, producing high quality and culturally valued products, research has shown that the unseen degradation of soil, water and air quality, as well as the more palpable domination of monocultural pastures geared towards industrialised production methods and the lack of biodiversity, add up to an urgent condition of depletion and exploitation. Commodification of nature and life has become one of the key instruments of agricultural intensification. Birds and insects have disappeared from the Swiss countryside, while production from the iconic Swiss cow has swollen to five times since the 1950s, not because of increased livestock numbers, but through selective breeding. Milking cow numbers have actually decreased by one third since 2000, while production has remained steady at 3.4 million tonnes/year. Even so-called conventional farmers engaged in intensive forms of production are under extreme economic pressure, having to rely significantly on subsidies, chemical imports and seasonal labour. Through direct payments for biodiversity and cultural landscape protection, they have become veritable “caretakers” of the Swiss landscape. Despite growing awareness around sustainable food production, pioneering agricultural practices from regenerative farming to demeter, community supported agriculture and other approaches, occupy only a small percentage of the economy. This is a profession difficult to enter under current Swiss regulations, including farmer’s education and inheritance laws. Today in Switzerland two farms per day cease production due economic difficulties. We did not inherit the land from our parents, we borrowed from our children”, (Farmer Zimmerberg). The Zurich cantonal border corresponds roughly to the commuting space of the metropolitan region, hence the agricultural landscapes are tightly interwoven with expanding urban development. Instead of focusing on the well-studied cities, our studio applies design as an instrument to readdress the territorial subject as a whole and develop an integrated vision for its agroecological transformation. This reversed view lies at the core of the methodology. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Inhalt | The MAS explores a new role for the designer who repairs damages wrought by urbanisation processes in the previous decades and asks how we can catalyse positive processes of transformation that lead to socially and environmentally just landscapes and territories. The project draws on a wealth of precedents at the Architecture of Territory Chair, and the accompanying lectures, sessions and courses. However an overarching territorial concept for the canton of Zurich, based on agroecological regeneration has never been drawn, visualised or proposed. Together, the eight case studies explored during the semester will contribute to such a vision. Our hypothesis is that agricultural land and practices can be interpreted through a number of distinct socio-spatial landscape typologies incorporating both the built and the unbuilt space. These typologies are historically and geographically specific–for example drained valley floors or pre-alpine pastures–therefore design efforts of agroecological repair must be situated, and respond to these unique contexts. This semester eight such typologies at dedicated sites have been selected for further design investigation; Metropolitan Core Zurich City), Gold Coast (Wädenswil), Drained Valley Floors (Furttal), Crop Rotation Plains (Embrach), Mosaic mid-heights (Mettenstetten), Seasonal Pastures (Wetzikon), Vital Streams & Water-bodies (The Glatt), Forests & Canopies (Tösstal). By diving deep into these specific landscapes of agricultural production, the studio aspires to raise questions unlocking the transformative potential of reparative thinking and practices in urban and territorial design. Can we rethink social relations linked to the land and define space for solidarity practices in agriculture? Can we redesign the cultural laws leading to commodification of landscape? Can we undo previous industrial practices and models of land drainage and other complex processes? The principles of agroecology are as old as agriculture itself, having long been utilised by, for example the indigenous Nahua or Māori people. Today supported by the UN Food and Agriculture Organisation, in particular towards achieving 12 of the 17 UN Sustainable Development Goals, agroecology is summarised in 10 principles that also include social values and governance. The design studio is at the core of the programme–sessions, courses and inputs are curated in such a way as to directly support the design work and project development through interdisciplinary exchange. In addition, significant resources are reserved for field work investigation in this unique studio, which plays a central role within the methodology–design work is based on in-depth exploration of the field and context. We will learn from different practices and engage with both regular and more extreme farmers and pioneers. Mobile and multisited ethnographies, interviews, oral histories, participant observation, visual study and archival work are indispensable to building a body of original research and to gradually formulating the research and design hypotheses in the studio. The fieldwork is generally conducted after the semester’s three-week overture period. It encompasses group and individual visits to project sites, meetings with inhabitants, community organizations and municipal offices. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Skript | REPRESENTING LANDSCAPE AND POSITIONS The project work develops in the form of a web-based investigative reportage. In the field, participants work through interviews, sketches, video and field notes. Back in the studio, experts in GIS, web design, architectural writing and videography support the process. Cartography is fundamental for both analytical and projective approaches to territory: GIS-based geospatial modelling will be applied on the project site to construct novel interpretative and critical landscape representations. Film and photography capture polysemic dimensions of territory, its social, material and more-than-human manifestations. An introduction to visual ethnography and visual anthropology will form an important element of the course. The investigative reportages and visions will be presented online and in the public forum meant to inform design practice and public discourse. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Kompetenzen |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 078-0103-00L | Postproduction II | 2 KP | 2G | M. Topalovic | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Kurzbeschreibung | In a concentrated workshop over three weeks at the ETH in June, postproduction of the ETH project work will be carried out and compiled into a documentation designed for both online and printed use. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lernziel | All project material, including texts from the writing seminar, maps, photographs, project drawings and models, will be evaluated, edited and curated according to the publication concept with the core teaching team and the guidance of a graphic designer. This postproduction and dissemination work is an integral part of the MAS programme, and crucial to its applied research and design agenda. The fieldwork documentation in the form of written online essays and visual evidence is part of the final results. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 078-0302-00L | Sessions on Territory | 1 KP | 1G | M. Topalovic | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Kurzbeschreibung | "Sessions on Territory" are public debates on the political economy of architecture and territory within and beyond the neoliberal order. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lernziel | "Sessions on Territory" is a series of public debates on the political economy of architecture and territory. Focus on the materials of architecture and urbanism — from territories of resource extraction to the construction site — the upcoming series unravel contemporary forces at work in the formation of the built and natural environment. Through a series of debates with invited guests, the seminar aims to critically reflect on the materiality of contemporary urbanism. Every intervention by a guest speaker is followed by a panel discussion with invited respondents. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Skript | Texts to accompany each presentation will be sent via email before each weekly session. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 078-0304-00L | Critical Writing | 2 KP | 2G | M. Topalovic, C. Schmid | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Kurzbeschreibung | Writing about the urban, landscape, and territory in the Anthropocene–a contested yet transdisciplinary term to describe the planetary condition under climate change and environmental catastrophe. Researchers from critical landscape and urban research engaging in the diverse fields of earth sciences, art, environmental humanities, agrarian, literary, and cultural studies provide insights. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lernziel | The seminar surveys key writings, ideas, and figures in the Anthropocene debate in conversation with critiques from environmental humanities and postcolonial studies. A number of invited guests working at the forefronts of Anthropocene research will bring seminar participants into their research and writing process. Additionally, the seminar will offer a number of hands-on critical writing and peer-review sessions to help the seminar participants develop and work with the allegories of the Anthropocene. The objective is to offer a pedagogical framework within which students learn to discuss their urban and territorial design work in relation to the theoretical writings studied in the accompanying Urban Theory Seminar, and inspitred by methods discussed in this seminar. The resulting texts should articulate the project’s broader theoretical, disciplinary, geographic, and sociocultural context as well as the specific design contribution. Students gain both theoretical and practical experience in writing, critical reflection and peer-reviewing. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Inhalt | Programme: 24.02 Introduction – Writing in the Anthropocene Nitin Bathla 03.03 Botanical City, Sandra Jasper 10.03 Histories of Settlement workshop, Hollyamber Kennedy & Anooradha Siddiqi 17.03 Landscapes in deep time: Nuclear Waste and the Swiss Alps, Rony Emmenegger 31.03 Landscapes of the empire, Hollyamber Kennedy 21.04 Territories of Swiss Colonialism, Denise Bertschi 28.04 A guided walk through the multispecies landscape of Zurich, Flurina Gardin 05.05 Geological Filmmaking, Laura Coppens 12.05 Landscapes of fossil capitalism, Giulia Scotto 19.05 LUS Doctoral Crits In addition, three dedicated sessions are offered to focus on preparing the MAS project texts for digital publishing. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Literatur | Access to an extensive literature list is provided at the beginning of the semester. Participants are asked to familiarise themselves with the selected texts before each session. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Kompetenzen |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||