Ana Peric Momcilovic: Catalogue data in Autumn Semester 2016 |
| Name | Dr. Ana Peric Momcilovic |
| Address | Raumentwicklung und Stadtpolitik ETH Zürich, HIL H 29.1 Stefano-Franscini-Platz 5 8093 Zürich SWITZERLAND |
| aperic@ethz.ch | |
| Department | Civil, Environmental and Geomatic Engineering |
| Relationship | Lecturer |
| Number | Title | ECTS | Hours | Lecturers | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 103-0569-00L | European Aspects of Spatial Development | 3 credits | 2G | A. Peric Momcilovic | |
| Abstract | Following the insight into historical perspective and contemporary models of governance and planning, the course focuses on the international dimension of spatial planning in Europe. This includes a discussion of how European spatial policy is made and by whom, how planners can participate in such process and how they can address transnational challenges of spatial development cooperatively. | ||||
| Learning objective | Keeping the general aim of exploring the European dimension of spatial planning in mind, the specific course learning objectives are as follows: - to interpret the history of spatial planning at the transnational scale - to understand and explain the content of the European spatial policy agenda - to describe and analyse the role of territorial cooperation in making European spatial development patterns and planning procedures - to discuss the changing role of planners and evaluate the ways of their engagement in European spatial policy-making | ||||
| Content | - European spatial policy agenda: introduction and basic directives - governance models - planning models; collaborative planning model (main concepts & critics) - post-positivist approach to spatial planning - transnational spatial planning in Europe; questioning the European spatial planning; spatial development trends in Europe - EU as a political system: EU institutions & non-EU actors - planning families in Europe; the European spatial planning agenda - spatial planning strategies and programmes on territorial cooperation - the notion of planning culture and planning system; planning cultures in Europe - basic characteristics of planning systems in Europe - the relevance of European transnational cooperation for spatial planning - European transnational initiatives: CODE 24 (Rotterdam-Genoa), Orient/east-Med corridor (Hamburg-Athens), Danube region | ||||
| Lecture notes | The documents for the lecture will be provided at the moodle, https://moodle-app2.let.ethz.ch/course/view.php?id=2298. | ||||
| Literature | Obligatory literature: - Dühr, S., Colomb, C. & Nadin, V. (2010). European Spatial Planning and Territorial Cooperation. London: Routledge. Recommended literature: Governance models: - Martens, K. (2007). Actors in a Fuzzy Governance Environment. In G. de Roo & G. Porter (Eds.), Fuzzy Planning: The Role of Actors in a Fuzzy Governance Environment (pp. 43-65). Abingdon, Oxon, GBR: Ashgate Publishing Group. Planning models: - Davoudi, S. & Strange, I. (2009). Conceptions of Space and Place in Strategic Spatial Planning. Abingdon, Oxon, GBR: Routledge. - Allmendinger, P. (2002). The Post-Positivist Landscape of Planning Theory. In P. Allmendinger & M. Tewdwr-Jones (Eds.), Planning Futures: New Directions for Planning Theory (pp. 3-17). London: Routledge. - Healey, P. (1997). Collaborative Planning - Shaping places in fragmented societies. London: MacMillan Press. EU as a political context: - Williams, R. H. (1996). European Union Spatial Policy and Planning. London: Sage. Territorial cooperation in Europe: - Dühr, S., Stead, D. & Zonneveld, W. (2007). The Europeanization of spatial planning through territorial cooperation. Planning Practice & Research, 22(3), 291-307. - Dühr, S. & Nadin, V. (2007). Europeanization through transnational territorial cooperation? The case of INTERREG IIIB North-West Europe. Planning Practice and Research, 22(3), 373-394. - Faludi, A. (Ed.) (2002). European Spatial Planning. Cambridge, Mass.: Lincoln institute of land policy. - Faludi, A. (2010). Cohesion, Coherence, Cooperation: European Spatial Planning Coming of Age? London: Routledge. - Faludi, A. (2014). EUropeanisation or Europeanisation of spatial planning? Planning Theory & Practice, 15(2), 155-169. - Kunzmann, K. R. (2006). The Europeanisation of spatial planning. In N. Adams, J. Alden & N. Harris (Eds.), Regional Development and Spatial Planning in an Enlarged European Union. Aldershot: Ashgate. Planning families and cultures: - Newman, P. & Thornley, A. (1996). Urban Plannning in Europe: international competition, national systems and planning projects. London: Routledge. - Knieling, J. & Othengrafen, F. (Eds.). (2009). Planning Cultures in Europe: Decoding Cultural Phenomena in Urban and Regional Planning. Aldershot: Ashgate. - Stead, D., de Vries, J. & Tasan-Kok, T. (2015). Planning Cultures and Histories: Influences on the Evolution of Planning Systems and Spatial Development Patterns. European Planning Studies, 23(11), 2127-2132. - Scholl, B. (Eds.) (2012). Spaces and Places of National Importance. Zurich: ETH vdf Hochschulverlag. Planning systems in Europe: - Nadin, V. & Stead, D. (2008). European Spatial Planning Systems, Social Models and Learning. disP - The Planning Review, 44(172), 35-47. - Commission of the European Communities. (1997). The EU compendium of spatial planning systems and policies. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. | ||||
| Prerequisites / Notice | Only for master students, otherwise a special permission by the lecturer is required. | ||||